This is my response
to #Ken ( #Scrum ) and # David (#Kanban)
Everyone has an opinion and everyone has the right to share it, creative criticism is a welcome. I am sure there are more room under Agile umbrella.
“Being a consumer of Agile ( I find a difference
in perspective people using Agile and people use Agile for living), it’s
about mere commonsense on what is required to bring a business excellence in
the given context. It’s a no brainer that problems plaguing large-scale
Enterprise include communication and coordination errors at
multiple levels people, process as well as technology integration
and infrastructure issues. In large Enterprises Programs are
complex with multiple LOB/ teams / legacy involved, also importantly
large programs are driven by disruptive technologies like Mobile, cloud etc..,
Synchronization of multiple touch points and early
integration testing form the two key ingredients in large-scale programs, and
SAFe suggest ways to solve many issues that may arise during these stages –
Portfolio->Program->Team.
It’s quite natural that people look at something which
resonates to their context. The timing and messaging of SAFe hits
bulls eye, no wonder it’s the talk in the town. You asks CIO of any
large organization ( fortune 100 -50), what bothers them is show me the
success of Agile? Let us wait and watch if SAFe is able to show something, as
any consumer does, we will look for a new FACE..”
Cheers
Prasad
1 comment:
Post a Comment